Monday, March 24, 2014

The Bible as Christian Scripture

Green (2007) cautions, “For the scientific reader of the Bible, there is no inherent need to concern ourselves with the significance of the Bible for ourselves” (pg. 13).  What does it mean to read the Bible as Christian Scripture?  How can one be an informed reader of scripture without turning the Bible into another subject of Study?  Reading the Bible as Christian scripture means recognizing that the various parts of scripture and scripture as a whole is for us, even if it was not originally to us.
The narratives of the Bible as Christian Scripture

Old Testament narratives
            Fee and Stuart (2003) report, “Unfortunately, failure to understand both the reason for and the character of the Hebrew narrative has caused many Christians in the past to read the Old Testament story very poorly…The intended value and meaning are replaced with ideas read into rather than out of the text” (p.89).  While it is important that we not interject meanings in the Old Testament stories that could have never been intended by the authors and original readers (creating parallels between the ark built by Noah and the cross of Christ, for example) it is even more destructive to assume that these stories are irrelevant in lieu of Christ. 

For one thing, the individual stories of both the Old and New Testament help us to see how our stories and the stories of those around us fit into God’s story.  Additionally, the story of redemption came to its fruition in the cross of Christ, but it was born long ago.  We see God pursuing his children, in the animal skins made for Adam and Eve, in the story of Noah and the Ark, in God’s calling of Abraham, the exodus, the life of King David, and throughout the stories of the prophets.  The story of God’s redemptive work is incomplete without the inclusion of the great many level narratives of the Old Testament.

New Testament narratives
According to Fee and Stuart (2003),
The crucial hermeneutical question here is whether biblical narratives that describe what happened in the early church also function as norms intended to delineate what must happen in the ongoing church…Our assumption, shared by many others is this: Unless Scripture explicitly tells us we must do something, what is only narrated or described function in a normative (i.e. obligatory) way-unless it can be demonstrated on other grounds that the author intended it to function in this way. (p. 118-119)

I concur with the above statements from Fee and Stuart (2003).  The bible is a descriptive text that has, far too often, been used prescriptively.  Portions of the New Testament were intended to teach, and other portions (mainly narrative portions), quite simply, were not.  Christians have largely done a poor job of differentiating the two and the result has led to unnecessary division. That being said, I do struggle somewhat with their blanket statement.

I specifically struggle with the idea that the actions of Jesus recorded in the gospel cannot hold prescriptive value.  I believe we are called to mimic the Christ as well as follow his teachings.  I also disagree with Fee and Stuart’s (2003) conclusion that the description of the church in Acts 2 does not have normative implications.  The model of this radical community has yielded miraculous results throughout history (The ministry of St Patrick, The early Methodist movement, and Yongi Full Gospel Church in modern day South Korea to name a few).  Finally, I believe that treating the narrative details as normative in our personal discipleship is appropriate if we feel led to do so.  If the Spirit speaks to us in this way, than we should surly follow its leading.

The letters and sermons of the New Testament as Christian Scripture

Letters
Fee and Stuart conclude, “Whenever we share comparable particulars (i.e., similar specific life situations) with the first-century hearers, God’s Word to us is the same as his Word to them…A great caution here is that we do our exegesis well so that we have confidence that our situations and particulars are genuinely comparable to theirs” (p. 75).  Schenk (2009) uses the issue of the household codes as an example.  The instruction in these codes “probably has more to do with being a good witness to non-Christians than God’s timeless plan for the household…Ironically, to fulfill the purpose of this verse, we would need to allow wives to have equal value and freedom in our households today” (Schenck, 2009, p. 21).  Even in the cases where God’s word is not the same, the spirit of what is said is.  In the example of the household codes, the concept of being a good witness is certainly applicable, though the instruction on how to do that is not. 
  
Sermons
Fee and Stuart (2003) instruct, “the teachings and imperatives of Jesus in the gospels should be brought into the twenty-first century in the same way as we do with Paul-or Peter of James-in the epistles…they are descriptions, by way of imperative, of what Christian life should be like because of God’s prior acceptance of us” (143).  The New Testament sermons are not specific and exhaustive commands that must be done, like some check list.  Instead they are general principals to illustrate what the life of Christians can and indeed should look like as a result of God’s saving grace.  Willard (1998) states “The teachings of Jesus in the Gospels show us how to live the life we have been given though the time, place, family, neighbors, talents, and opportunities that are ours.  His words left to us in scripture provide all we need in the way of general teachings about how to conduct our particular affairs” (p. 284).  The “spirit” of the sermons instruct us how to live a life that reflects the good news of Christ.  In its basic form these principals all relate to the two great commands (To love God and to love people). 

The prophetic and apocalyptic materials in the Bible as Christian Scripture

The prophetic materials
Fee and Stuart (2003) state, “The prophets did announce the future.  But it was usually the immediate future…rather than our future” (p. 182).  I agree that prophesies in these texts were directed to the original audience and thus, are completed items.  To use the prophets as some sort of biblical crystal ball is to “miss the point.”  Their primary function was “to speak for God to their own contemporaries” (Fee and Stuart, 2003, p. 182). The prophets were God’s messengers and to think that there message was irrelevant to those they were delivering it to is ignoring that role.  The prophets were faithfully speaking for God to their contemporaries and it is for that reason that there oracles could not be referring to the distant future, to our future.  The prophets did predict future events, but those events have already come to fruition. 

Recognizing that the prophets do not have future oracles for us does not mean that God does not have a message for us from them.  Fee and Stuart (2003) note, “Once we hear what God said to them, even if our circumstances differ considerably, we will often hear it again in our own settings in a rather direct way” (p. 199).   The prophets may not reveal our future to us, but they reveal to us God’s desires for His followers, and those expectations are as true for us today as they were for the original audience. 

The apocalyptic materials
Fee and Stuart (2003) report, “Apocalypses in general, and Revelation in particular, seldom intend to give a detailed chronological account of the future.  Their message tends to transcend this kind of concern” (p. 257).  The apocalyptic materials, like the prophetic materials, had a relevant message to their original audience.  These materials have been mishandled by a multitude of people.  This writings are meant to bring hope in the midst of difficult situations, not be used “to break the code” and discover when the world is coming to an end. 

Once we accept the intended role of the apocalyptic materials role as scripture, the role of proclaiming the faithfulness of God in the midst of hard times, and the God’s ultimate reign and victory, these texts serve a very real role for Christians today.  On a personal level we have all faced hard times, that though different, resonate with what the original audience was facing in the apocalyptic writings.  In a broad sense, the message to this audience is the same message that these writings have for us today.  Things are never hopeless, for Christ is victor! 

The legal material of the Old Testament as Christian Scripture
According to Fee and Stuart (2003) the law was “God’s gift to his people to establish the ways they were to live in community with one another and provide for their relationship with and worship of Yahweh, their God” (p. 163).  Christians today are part of a new covenant with God through Christ and that must impact the way we look at the law.    

The Old Testament and the Ancient Near East
The Old Testament Law was connected with the culture of the Ancient Near East.  It shares characteristics with both the Code of Hammurabi and the Laws of Eshnunna which preceded it.  Yet, as Fee and Stuart (2003) point out, “The Old Testament Law represents a quantum leap ahead ethically over such codes” (p. 177).  Fee and Stuart (2003) point out the contrast between the Old Testament Law and these other laws concerning the Value of women and slaves.  This is just one example that shows that the Old Testament Law called God’s people to a way of life that was counter-cultural. 

The law and God’s long term design
God presented Old Testament Law in a way that fit in Israel’s context but that does not mean that it does not reflect God’s long term design for his followers.  Fee and Stuart (2003) suggest that God’s own character is revealed through the Law.  The Law also establishes a relationship between God and his people.  Fee and Stuart state “The Israelites as God’s people were to worship, and thus be like God” (p171).  This is all part of God’s long term design.  God still desires a relationship with His followers, a relationship that includes loyalty.  Likewise, God still wants His followers to be like Him.  Consider Jesus’ instruction to “be perfect as God is perfect” (Matthew 5:48). 

The poetic materials of the Bible Christian Scripture
The poetic materials of the Bible are unique because they are written to/about God rather than a message from God (Fee and Stuart, 2003).  This is not to say that we cannot learn about God from these materials and it is certainly not to say that they do not hold value for today’s Christian.  Fee and Stuart (2003) suggest that “The Psalms…are of great benefit to the believer who looks to the bible for help in expressing joys and sorrows, successes and failures, hopes and regrets (p. 205). 
  
Poetic materials and doubt
I especially find the Psalms of lament to be helpful in this regard.  We are often taught today that faith is the absence of doubt, that it is blind acceptance.  We feel that we should minimize are feelings and “stay the course” when difficult things happen and when we frustrated and confused by the circumstances of our lives.  I am convinced that this is a practice that is very destructive to our relationship with God.  

From these Psalms we learn that faith is not the absence of anger and doubt, but rather it is trust in God in the middle of our anger and doubt.  The closer our relationship with our friends and loved ones the more real, we can be, the more we can express, even if it is disappointment.  We learn from these texts that the same is true of our relationship with God.  The poetic scripture teach us that we serve a God big enough to handle our hurt, doubts and anger. 

Conclusion: the whole Bible as Christian Scripture
To read the Bible as Christian scripture we must realize that the various parts of scripture and scripture as a whole is for us, even if it was not originally to us.  When I think of viewing the Bible as Christian Scripture I think of those I care about, such as my wife and children.  It is possible for someone to know all the facts about my family without actually knowing them.  One can find out my daughters date of birth, eye color, and even social security number without knowing her.  On the other hand, it is impossible for me to develop a loving relationship with my wife without knowing many of these things about her.  You cannot but learn all the details about someone if you care for them.  That is how I think about the Bible as Christian Scripture.  The bible can be memorized and known forward and back, but if it is just a text, it won’t mean anything to the reader.  On the other hand the Bible as Christian Scripture necessitates that we use all the textual tools to learn as much as possible.  The difference with those I care about is the relationship.  The difference with Christian Scripture is seeking/allowing the Bible to transform us.

Common literary tools can rightly be used when reading the Bible to discover more of God’s message, but using these tools to “master” the sacred text like we would an old work of fiction is not appropriate.   Green (2007) says, “For the scientific reader of the Bible, there is no inherent need to concern ourselves with the significance of the Bible for ourselves” (pg. 13).     Encountering God’s word is for the purpose of formation, not just understanding.  Mulholland Jr. states, “The Word is truly the mediator between us and God.” 2 Timothy 3:16 says “All scripture is inspired by God” (New Living Translation).  The Bible is not something that we should seek to master, but rather something we should allow to master us.  It is not appropriate to let our literary tools get in the way of formation through our encounters with Scripture.  


References
Fee, G.D and Stuart, D. (2003).  How to read the Bible for all its worth (3rd Ed).  Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan.   
Green, J.B. (2007).  Seized by truth: Reading the Bible as Scripture.  Nashville, TN: Abingdon Press. 
Mulholland Jr., M.R. (2000). Shaped by the Word: The power of Scripture in spiritual formation (2nd ed.).Nashville. TN: Upper Room Books.
Schenck, K. (2009). Brief guide to Biblical interpretation. (2nd ed.). Marion, IN: Triangle Publishing.
Willard, D. (1998). The divine conspiracy: rediscovering our hidden life in God. New York, NY: HarperCollins.   






Monday, March 17, 2014

Missional Theology and St Patrick's day.

The following are two large excerpts (the introduction and the conclusion) from an article I wrote about St Patrick. A condensed version re-posted today on the blog of http://www.thehousestudio.com/.  For all the good stuff in the middle of the article you will need to go here: http://www.thehousestudio.com/real-st-patrick-roman-imperative/
St. Patrick was a remarkable individual whose intrigue had nothing to do with leprechauns and rainbows. Though Patrick was ethnically a Celt, he was culturally a Roman whose primary language was Latin. He grew up in a Christian home with a deacon for a father and a priest for a grandfather. As a youth, Patrick was what some might call a “lukewarm” Christian, saying of himself, “At the time, I did not recognize the True God.”[1] According to Patrick, it was this rejection of God that led to his life being turned upside down when a band of Celtic pirates invaded the region, captured Patrick, and sold him into slavery. During his years as a slave, Patrick experienced two major changes.First, Patrick experienced the revelation of God through nature and became a devout Christian.
. . . after I reached Ireland I used to pasture the flock each day and I used to pray many times a day. More and more did the love of God, and my fear of him and faith increase, and my spirit was moved so that in a day [I said] from one up to a hundred prayers, and in the night a like number; besides I used to stay out in the forests and on the mountain and I would wake up before daylight to pray in the snow, in icy coldness, in rain, and I used to feel neither ill nor any slothfulness, because, as I now see, the Spirit was burning in me at that time.[2]
Second, Patrick, immersed in a new environment, came to understand and accept the Celtic culture of his captors. It was this deep understanding of the Celtic world that later allowed him to effectively reach the “unreachable” with the good news of Christ. After six years of captivity, God told Patrick in a dream to flee from his captors.
The next 25 years or so of Patrick’s life are unknown, but at the age of 48, Patrick had another dream where an angel named Victor spoke to him. During that dream Patrick was called to bring the “good news of Christ” to the Celtic world. Patrick returned to Ireland as a bishop with this mission. Patrick’s 28 years of ministry to the Celts—and the movement that followed—forever changed the Western world...
...Like some 1600 years ago, the world’s churches are largely content with neglecting a major portion of the harvest. Thus, the model of St. Patrick and those who followed him can be of some use. Maybe an approach that recognizes God is big enough to reach people exactly where they are is the key. In St. Patrick’s time, a barbarian people wanted to know that they belonged. Today’s “lost” may not be so different. Are we going to demand that they become civilized, or are we going to create opportunities for them to be accepted and to experience the living God?
1. St. Patrick, The Confession of St. Patrick (Grand Rapids: Christian Classics Ethereal Library), http://www.ccel.org/ccel/Patrick/confession.pdf. This first section of his writing is St. Patrick’s own account of his life and the events that lead up to his mission in Ireland. Though that is not its primary purpose. Patrick’s Confession is a defense of his life and ministry.
2. Ibid., paragraph 16. 

Monday, March 3, 2014

Biblical Theology

New Testament governs Old
Schenck (2009) states, “But from a Christian perspective, the New Testament provides an authoritative lens through which to read the Old Testament.  New Testament passages thus take priority when integrating New Testament with Old” (p.62).  This being said, I do not believe that the Old and New Testament’s contradict each other as some suppose.  Fee and Stuart (2003) suggest that God’s own character is revealed through the Old Testament Law.  The Law also establishes a relationship between God and his people.  This is all part of God’s long term design.  God still desires a relationship with His followers, a relationship that includes loyalty.  I believe then that the New Testament does not correct the Old Testament as much as it helps to interpret it.  
The kingdom trajectory
Love of God and Love of Neighbor
According to Schenck (2009), “The New Testament already has as its prevalent principle the love of God and the love of neighbor as the absolute principles of New Testament ethics” (p.63).    The kingdom trajectory is one build on love.  “Thy Kingdom come” is a kingdom driven by love for God and love for fellow brothers and sisters. This love is two sides of the same coin (1 John 4:20).
Eschatology
Schenck (2009) concludes that the kingdom perspective “asks where the biblical texts seem to indicate God will eventually lead the world, particularly after Christ’s return” (p.63).  A kingdom trajectory focuses on end times, when Christ will return and God’s creation will be reconciled to Him.  God’s story that begun with creation will ultimately conclude the separation that begun with the fall.       
Center points in the church
Schenck (2009) states, “What we are ultimately seeking here is the kingdom perspective on any given topic” (p.66).  The kingdom trajectory then, serves as the center point of the church.  Love of God and love of neighbor Schenck (2009) concludes “The biblical and ethical principal of love must stand as the governing element in the equation of any biblical instruction.  Specifically, then, the great commandments of love, taught by Christ in the gospels stand as the center points of the church.  Doctrine, scripture and praxis are all determined by love for God and love for fellow man and woman.  God’s will is these two loves exemplified and they ever present with the coming of God’s kingdom. 

“Schenck, K. (2009). Brief guide to Biblical interpretation. (2nd ed.). Marion, IN: Triangle Publishing