Wednesday, April 3, 2013

Seeking Cultural Relevancy is not Heresy! (St Patrick Pt 2)


I am so sick of any attempt to be culturally relevant being branded as heresy. Historically, ignoring the world that "the mission field" lived in has been disastrous.  Even the most conservative of denominations have missionaries who take great pains to understand the cultures they are entering.  Why are we not learning from our history?!  The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, expecting somehow to have different results.

The early Roman church believed that cultural changes and conformity were necessary for the spreading of the good news. It was assumed that a culture had to be civilized, at least in part, (ie “Romanized”) as a prerequisite to become Christian. Once Christian, further conformity to the Roman norm was expected. These populations were expected to adopt Roman customs, including reading and speaking Latin as well as doing church “the Roman way.” This was not initially the case with the early Roman church; stories of the first century church report missional outreach to cultures that were neither Roman nor civilized (cannibal populations were even on the list of those receiving the good news). However, by the second century it was assumed that reaching barbarians for Christ was impossible.1

Protestant missions have historically followed a similar two pronged focus; to both evangelize and civilize the culture. Here too, many believed that a certain level of civility was needed for acceptance of the gospel to be possible. Generally, civilizing was defined by the nation that was sending the missionaries. Spanish missionaries sought to make peoples more Spanish while puritans from Britain tried to make them more English.4 International missions today has moved passed the model of required conformity, but domestically we often fall into the trap of believing that societal conformity is prerequisite for receiving the good news of Christ. Perhaps this is why Christians often feel the need to impose Christian values on the unbelieving world.2

We experience this same tension within modern-day ministry. The culture of today, for example, is not always seen as “civilized.” Adults shake their heads when young adults have the audacity to wear hats in church services, or check their cell phones during the sermon. They can’t believe that being talked at for forty minutes is not engaging to youth, even though their own minds are distracted. I can’t think of a single time this past year that an adult has asked me how youth group went last night, or how God was working in the lives of our young people, and yet, I can recall numerous moments when youth were criticized for not picking up after themselves in our church. Do we think that God can’t work in young people’s lives until they start vacuuming up their own pretzel crumbs? Is Christian stewardship a prerequisite for receiving the good news of Christ?

I recently heard a powerful story about a young urban youth who accepted Christ. This newborn Christian was so excited about his conversion that his enthusiasm spread and he took a friend with him to church the following Sunday. Neither of these young men owned church clothes, so they wore what they thought was their nicest clothes. When they arrived at the front doors of the church one of the elders was waiting with his arms crossed. He told the young men to “come back when they had learned how to show God proper respect”.

We all have stories similar to this. The message is similar to that of the Roman church: “You have to be like us if you want to be a Christian.”
Youth workers can engage students differently, encouraging them to stay within their culture while seeking to understand the person of Jesus.

1.   George G. Hunter III, The Celtic Way of Evangelism: How Christianity Can Reach the West…Again (Nashville: Abingdon Press, 2000) pp17.
2.   Ibid., pp 16


No comments:

Post a Comment